India Pulse
Pension Schemes
Domain: Gender, Family & Social RightsNot enough votes yet to publish a national mix for this topic.
Current question being voted on
Should states with high pension burdens be required to reduce employee benefits to fund essential public infrastructure?
Join to add your voice →By occupational group (top 5)
Occupational group breakdown unlocks as votes accumulate.
Related news
- India state fiscal health: Pension burden highest in Himachal Pradesh - Business Standard [Himachal News]
- DA arrears, OPS: Punjab braces for ‘Maha Hartal’ by government employees on Thursday - The Indian Express [Punjab News]
- Pension cut without board nod unlawful: MP HC - The Times of India [Madhya Pradesh News]
- Anurag attacks state govt over taxes, pending pensioners’ dues - The Tribune [Tribune HP]
- Keralam government sanctions ₹32 crore for ‘Pravasi’ welfare pensions ahead of Onam - The Hindu [The Hindu Kerala]
Other positions on this topic
- → Should government employees have the right to strike if it disrupts essential public services?
- → Should administrative boards have the final say on pension cuts, or should the government have unilateral power to adjust them?
- → Should state governments be legally mandated to pay interest on delayed pension dues to retired employees?
- → Should state governments prioritize welfare pensions for non-resident citizens over local infrastructure development?